Industrial manufacturing
Industrial Internet of Things | Industrial materials | Equipment Maintenance and Repair | Industrial programming |
home  MfgRobots >> Industrial manufacturing >  >> Manufacturing Technology >> 3D printing

TPE vs TPU: Key Differences & Choosing the Right Material for 3D Printing

TPE (Thermoplastic Elastomer) is a rubber that has both thermoplastic and elastomer properties. TPU (Thermoplastic Polyurethane), on the other hand, is a form of TPE. TPU and TPE are flexible filaments used as 3D printing materials for designs that require stretch or bend qualities. They also give a “soft-to-the-touch” quality to printed products.

In general, TPEs tend to be softer and more flexible compared to TPUs. Because TPU is still flexible but more rigid, it is also an easier material with which to print. However, TPE is more commonplace because it has been on the market for a longer time. TPE is also generally less expensive compared to TPU. TPU performs well in heavier, tougher, and more durable prototypes, whereas TPE filament is more geared for lighter, softer, and more flexible models.

In this article, we are going to look at TPE vs. TPU in terms of their differences, their applications, and the properties that make them unique in the additive manufacturing industry.

TPE Definition and Comparison to TPU

TPE is known for its robustness and flexibility. It is available as filament for FDM printers and as a powder for SLS machines. Though TPE is still fairly new to the additive manufacturing industry, it has been around as a material for industrial use since the 1950s. EOS was the first company to launch TPE as a material for SLS printing back in 2013. TPE goes by the name PrimePart ST (PEBA 2301). This introduction was followed by the launch of CRP Technology’s TPE material, called Windform® RL.

As a polymer material, TPE combines the characteristics of thermoplastic and thermoset vulcanized rubber. Variants of TPE include a range of flexible materials, such as Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU), Thermoplastic Polyamide (TPA), and Thermoplastic Copolyester (TPC). TPE printed models and prototypes have been used in industries such as automotive and medical. TPE has been used in the manufacturing of sports shoes and can also be found in electronics—for example, the plastic casing around some headphone cables or any other application where rubber-like qualities are required.

Advantages of TPE Compared to TPU

TPE has the following advantages when compared to TPU:

Disadvantages of TPE Compared to TPU

TPE has the following disadvantages compared to TPU:

TPU Definition and Comparison to TPE

TPU and TPE form part of the same family. BF Goodrich (now known as Lubrizol Advanced Materials) invented TPU in 1959; it is not a recently discovered material. However, its application in 3D printing is still relatively new. Due to its unique properties, TPU has been gaining interest in the additive manufacturing industry. Its printed products have been applied to various industries. 

TPU can be used as printing material in two types of 3D printers—Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) printers and Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) printers. With FDM printers, the material in filament form is used to print the desired models. With SLS, a powder form is used. In the long run, printing with an FDM printer will be more cost-effective. 

TPU comes in a wide range of opaque colors as well as transparent. Its surface finish can range from smooth to rough (to provide grip). One of the unique features of TPU is that its hardness can be customized. This ability to control hardness can result in materials ranging from soft (rubbery) to hard (rigid plastic). 

The application of TPU is very versatile. Industries that use TPU printed products include aerospace, automotive, footwear, sports, and medical. TPU is also used as a casing for wires in the electrical industry and as protective cases for electronic devices, such as mobile phones or tablets. 

Table 1. TPE vs. TPU Comparison

AttributeTPETPU

Attribute

Extruder temperature

TPE

210–260 °C (varies)

TPU

220–250 °C (varies)

Attribute

Bed temperature

TPE

Up to 110 °C (varies)

TPU

Up to 60 °C (varies)

Attribute

Impact resistant

TPE

Yes

TPU

Yes

Attribute

Waterproof

TPE

Yes

TPU

Yes

Attribute

UV resistant

TPE

Yes

TPU

Yes

Attribute

Chemical resistance

TPE

Med

TPU

Med-High

Attribute

Abrasion resistance

TPE

Med-Low

TPU

High

Attribute

Heat resistance

TPE

High

TPU

High

Attribute

Strength

TPE

Low

TPU

Med-High

Attribute

Flexibility

TPE

High

TPU

Med-High

Attribute

Recommended printing speed

TPE

5–50+ mm/s (varies)

TPU

5–50+ mm/s (varies)

Attribute

Cost (per kg)

TPE

$40+

TPU

$45+

Though TPE and TPU do differ, they also have some overlapping qualities. Both TPE and TPU are waterproof, UV resistant, and have good heat and impact resistance. 

TPE vs. TPU: Applications Comparison

TPE is ideal for applications where flexible models are required. These are often lighter and softer products such as sports gear grips (e.g., hockey stick handles), toys, mouthpieces in the medical industry, waterproof seals, airbag covers, and bumpers.   

TPU, on the other hand, offers a combination of scratch and abrasion resistance. This material is used in producing console parts, instrument panels, athletic shoes, and seals & gaskets. 

TPE vs. TPU: Part Accuracy Comparison

Because TPE is more prone to shrinkage compared to TPU, it is also more difficult to print dimensionally accurate models with TPE. TPU is more rigid and easier with which to print and generally yields more accurate print results. 

TPE vs. TPU: Speed Comparison

The speed setting for both print materials depends on the desired properties, for example, the flexibility of the end product. Appropriate print settings will depend on the type of TPE and TPU used, the manufacturer and model of the printer, and the set layer thickness. The required printing speed of TPE and TPU are in a similar range, 5–50 mm/s. In rare cases, both TPE and TPU can print at higher speeds. However, for accurate results, it is recommended to use printing speeds below 35 mm/s.

TPE vs. TPU: Surface Comparison

TPU tends to have a smoother surface finish compared to TPE, which usually has a rubber-like finish. 

TPE vs. TPU: Heat Resistance Comparison

Both TPE and TPU filaments offer good heat resistance. 

TPE vs. TPU: Biodegradability Comparison

Both TPU and TPE biodegrade in 3–5 years and are therefore considered eco-friendly 3D printing materials.

TPE vs. TPU: Toxicity Comparison

Although TPU is non-toxic in nature, it releases harmful fumes when exposed to fire or other chemicals. When burnt, TPU gives off a distinct odor that can cause headaches whereas TPE is non-toxic and has a faint aroma when burnt. 

TPE vs. TPU: Cost Comparison

The relative costs of TPE vs. TPU per kg vary across the different brands. Popular brands of TPE filament, such as eSun TPE, Matterhackers, and 3dXFlex TPE range from $40/kg up to ~$140/kg. Some popular brands of TPU filament include Kodak Flex TPU (~$65/kg), Ultimaker TPU (~$90/kg), MatterHackers TPU (~$45–$55/kg), Polymaker PolyFlex (~$50–90/kg), and NinjaTek (~$110–$180/kg), among others. 

What Are the Mutual Alternatives to TPE and TPU?

The following material is considered a mutual alternative to TPE and TPU:

Similarities Between TPE and TPU

TPE and TPU share the following similarities:

Summary

This article contrasted TPE and TPU, both of which are commonly used 3D printing materials. To learn more about which plastic is better and how Xometry can assist material selection, contact a Xometry representative.

Xometry provides a wide range of manufacturing capabilities including 3D printing and value-added services for all of your prototyping and production needs. Visit our website to learn more or to request a free, no-obligation quote.

Trademark and Copyright Notice

  1. Windform® RL is a registered trademark of CRP Technology, Moderna, Italy.

Disclaimer

The content appearing on this webpage is for informational purposes only. Xometry makes no representation or warranty of any kind, be it expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or validity of the information. Any performance parameters, geometric tolerances, specific design features, quality and types of materials, or processes should not be inferred to represent what will be delivered by third-party suppliers or manufacturers through Xometry’s network. Buyers seeking quotes for parts are responsible for defining the specific requirements for those parts. Please refer to our terms and conditions for more information.

Dean McClements

Dean McClements is a B.Eng Honors graduate in Mechanical Engineering with over two decades of experience in the manufacturing industry. His professional journey includes significant roles at leading companies such as Caterpillar, Autodesk, Collins Aerospace, and Hyster-Yale, where he developed a deep understanding of engineering processes and innovations.

Read more articles by Dean McClements


3D printing

  1. 3D Printing vs. Traditional Manufacturing: A Professional Comparison of Methods and Benefits
  2. Common 3D Printer Filament Feeding Issues & Quick Fixes
  3. Multi‑Material 3D Printing: The Future of Additive Manufacturing
  4. Choosing Between SLA and SLS for Rapid Prototyping: Which Is Right for Your Project?
  5. BCN3D Omega I60: Understanding the Active Heated Chamber for Superior 3D Printing
  6. PSYONIC’s Agile Manufacturing: Making Bionic Hands Affordable and Accessible
  7. Mastering Multi‑Jet Fusion (MJF): A Comprehensive Guide to 3D Printing Excellence
  8. Material Extrusion in 3D Printing: Definition, History, Applications, and Workflow
  9. PolyJet vs. SLS 3D Printing: Key Differences & Comparative Insights
  10. Formlabs Unveils Advanced 3D Packing for Fuse 1, Cutting Print Costs by Up to 46%