Industrial manufacturing
Industrial Internet of Things | Industrial materials | Equipment Maintenance and Repair | Industrial programming |
home  MfgRobots >> Industrial manufacturing >  >> Industrial materials >> Nanomaterials

3D Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanowire Scaffold Boosts Flexibility and Capacitance in Solid‑State Supercapacitors

Abstract

\n

This study reports a three‑dimensional composite electrode that couples a graphitic carbon nitride (g‑C3N4) nanowire scaffold with the conductive polymer PEDOT:PSS to create a flexible, solid‑state supercapacitor. By leveraging the high surface area of the nanowire network, the composite surpasses pure PEDOT:PSS, achieving a specific capacitance of 202 F g−1. The device maintains 83.5 % of its initial capacitance after 5,000 charge‑discharge cycles, demonstrating exceptional cycling stability while preserving mechanical flexibility.

\n
\n

Background

\n

Wearable energy storage, particularly flexible supercapacitors, has attracted significant interest due to their high power density and robust cycling performance [1,2,3,4]. Current electrode materials fall into three main categories: carbon‑based high‑surface‑area materials (e.g., activated carbon, graphene, carbon fibers), transition metal oxides (MOs), and conducting polymers (CPs) [5,6,7,8]. While carbon electrodes store charge through electrochemical double‑layer capacitance (EDLC), MOs and CPs operate via Faradaic pseudocapacitance [9,10,11]. MOs offer high theoretical capacities but suffer from poor conductivity, toxicity, instability, and cost; CPs overcome many of these issues yet are limited by relatively low mechanical and cycle durability and a modest specific surface area, which hampers their applicability in flexible devices.

\n

To reconcile these trade‑offs, composite strategies that integrate 3D EDLC materials with MO or CP pseudocapacitive partners have emerged as promising solutions [12,13,14]. Among carbon candidates, graphitic carbon nitride (g‑C3N4)—a two‑dimensional graphene analogue—has recently been spotlighted for its favorable electronic properties, low cost, and environmental friendliness [15,16]. Although g‑C3N4 has been extensively studied for photocatalysis [17–22], its potential in energy storage remains underexplored, particularly in three‑dimensional morphologies [23–27]. PEDOT:PSS, a widely used conductive polymer, offers high conductivity and mechanical resilience, yet its limited surface area restricts capacitance. Enhancing its active area through a 3D scaffold is therefore a logical path forward.

\n

In this work, we synthesize a 3D g‑C3N4 nanowire (GCNW) framework that serves as a structural backbone for PEDOT:PSS. The resulting composite delivers a specific capacitance of 202 F g−1 in a three‑electrode configuration and 78 F g−1 in a symmetric, all‑solid‑state device, achieving an energy density of 6.66 Wh kg−1 at 200 W kg−1. The study also examines how varying the g‑C3N4 ratio influences morphology and electrochemical performance.

\n
\n
\n

Methods

\n

Materials

\n

Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and urea were sourced from Beijing Chemical Corp. PEDOT:PSS (1.0 wt.% in H2O, high‑conductivity grade) was purchased from Sigma‑Aldrich. No further purification was performed.

\n

Synthesis of g‑C3N4

\n

Urea (10 g) was calcined at 550 °C (10 °C min−1) for 2 h in a muffle furnace to yield yellow g‑C3N4 powder.

\n

Three‑Dimensional Fabrication of the GCNW

\n

Five hundred milligrams of g‑C3N4 powder were dispersed in 20 mL of 3 M NaOH, stirred at 60 °C for 12 h, then sonicated for 2 h. Excess NaOH was removed by dialysis, and the resulting nanowire hydrogel was freeze‑dried to produce a self‑supporting aerogel.

\n

Three‑Dimensional Preparation of GCNW/PEDOT:PSS Composite

\n

The composite was assembled with four mass ratios of GCNW to PEDOT:PSS: 10 %, 20 %, 50 %, and 80 % (6 mg mL−1 GCNW). After 12 h of stirring, the mixtures were freeze‑dried. A pure PEDOT:PSS thin film was fabricated by filtration for comparison.

\n

Characterization

\n

Morphology and structure were examined by field‑emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, JEOL 7610), transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Tecnai F20), and X‑ray diffraction (XRD, D‑MAX II A). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Nicolet‑6700) and X‑ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB MK II) probed chemical composition.

\n

Electrochemical Measurement

\n

Electrochemical performance was measured with a CHI 660E workstation. In a three‑electrode setup, a platinum foil served as counter and a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as reference. Working electrodes were fabricated by pressing the composite onto carbon cloth (1 mg cm−2 loading). The electrolyte was 1 M H2SO4. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) were recorded over 0–1 V. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) spanned 1–105 Hz with a 5 mV perturbation.

\n

Symmetric devices were assembled by depositing 2 mg of active material on each carbon cloth electrode, separating them with a PVA/H2SO4 hydrogel soaked on non‑woven fabric, and then sandwiching the layers. Electrochemical tests were performed on these two‑electrode cells.

\n

The specific capacitance of a single electrode (Cm) was calculated from CV data: \n\nCm = \frac{1}{U\nu}\int_{U^{-}}^{U^{+}}i(U)dU\n\nwhere U is the voltage window and ν is the scan rate. Energy (E) and power (P) densities were derived from: \n\nE = \frac{1}{2}CU^{2}\n\nP = \frac{E}{\Delta t}\n

\n
\n
\n

Results and Discussion

\n

The fabrication workflow and device architecture are illustrated in Fig. 1. The g‑C3N4 nanowire content critically determines the 3D framework; a minimum of 20 % GCNW is required to preserve the scaffold, whereas higher PEDOT:PSS concentrations (90 %) collapse the structure. Sodium hydroxide concentration also dictates the micro‑architecture: <3 M fails to cleave the layers adequately, while >8 M over‑cuts the nanowires and collapses the aerogel. A 3 M NaOH treatment therefore yields the most robust 3D scaffold.

\n
\n\n\n3D Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanowire Scaffold Boosts Flexibility and Capacitance in Solid‑State Supercapacitors\n\n

The experimental procedures of GCNW/PEDOT:PSS composite material and flexible device

\n
\n

SEM images (Fig. 2a–c) reveal the transformation from layered g‑C3N4 to nanowire and the maintenance of a 3D network in the 20 % composite. TEM confirms nanowire dimensions of ~10 nm width and several hundred nanometers length (Fig. 2d–e). The BET surface areas are 82.67 m2 g−1 for GCNW and 69.86 m2 g−1 for the 20 % composite, while pure PEDOT:PSS exhibits a negligible surface area.

\n
\n\n\n3D Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanowire Scaffold Boosts Flexibility and Capacitance in Solid‑State Supercapacitors\n\n

Structure characterization. FESEM images of g‑C3N4 (a), GCNW (b), and 20% GCNW/PEDOT:PSS (c). TEM images of g‑C3N4 (d), GCNW (e), and 20% GCNW/PEDOT:PSS (f) with 3D structure

\n
\n

XRD patterns (Fig. 3a) show sharp (100) and (200) peaks of g‑C3N4 at 13.84° and 27.81°, while a broad PEDOT:PSS feature between 15°–30° indicates the polymer’s amorphous nature. FTIR spectra (Fig. 3b) confirm the characteristic triazine ring (804 cm−1) and C‑N heterocycles (1299–1605 cm−1) of g‑C3N4, alongside PEDOT:PSS signatures. XPS (Fig. 3c–f) verifies the presence of C, N, O, S, and residual Na from NaOH, confirming that the composite is a physical mixture without chemical bonding.

\n
\n\n\n3D Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanowire Scaffold Boosts Flexibility and Capacitance in Solid‑State Supercapacitors\n\n

a XRD patterns and b FT‑IR spectra of GCNW, PEDOT:PSS, and GCNW/PEDOT:PSS composites with different content ratio. c XPS survey spectra of 20% GCNW. The high resolution of C 1s (d), N 1s (e), and O 1s (f) XPS spectra of 20% GCNW

\n
\n

Electrochemical evaluation (Fig. 4) shows that the 20 % composite delivers the largest CV area and the longest GCD times, confirming superior capacitance. At 5 mV s−1, its specific capacitance is 202 F g−1, a 46.9 % improvement over pure PEDOT:PSS. The composite also retains 83.5 % of its initial capacitance after 5,000 cycles (Fig. 5c). The enhanced performance is attributed to the 3D scaffold, which increases active sites and shortens ion diffusion pathways.

\n
\n\n\n3D Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanowire Scaffold Boosts Flexibility and Capacitance in Solid‑State Supercapacitors\n\n

The electrochemical performances of GCNW, PEDOT:PSS, and GCNW/PEDOT:PSS samples with different content ratio of GCNW and PEDOT:PSS. a Cyclic voltammograms at the scan rate of 10 mV s−1. b Galvanostatic discharge curves at current densities of 1 A g−1. c Cyclic voltammograms with scan rate from 5 mV s−1 to 100 mV s−1. d Galvanostatic discharge curves at various current densities. e Specific capacitances of GCNW, PEDOT:PSS, and 20% GCNW/PEDOT:PSS at different scan rate

\n
\n

The symmetric supercapacitor, assembled with 20% GCNW/PEDOT:PSS on carbon cloth, exhibits a rectangular CV shape across 0–1 V (Fig. 5a) and an ESR of 5.41 Ω (Fig. 5b). After 5,000 cycles at 1 A g−1, the device retains 83.5 % of its capacitance (Fig. 5c). Mechanical flexibility tests reveal that capacitance retention remains above 80 % after 2,000 bending cycles at 90° (Additional file 1: Figure S11). Energy density reaches 6.66 Wh kg−1 at 200 W kg−1 (Fig. 5d).

\n
\n\n\n3D Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanowire Scaffold Boosts Flexibility and Capacitance in Solid‑State Supercapacitors\n\n

a The CV curve of the single device. b The EIS of the device. c The cycling stability of the device. d Power density and energy density of the device

\n
\n
\n\n\n3D Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanowire Scaffold Boosts Flexibility and Capacitance in Solid‑State Supercapacitors\n\n

The voltage value of flexible solid‑state supercapacitors based on 20% GCNW under different bending angles (a: 0°, b: 30°, c: 60°, d: 90°)

\n
\n
\n
\n

Conclusion

\n

For the first time, a 3D g‑C3N4 nanowire/PEDOT:PSS composite has been fabricated and deployed as an electrode for flexible supercapacitors. The 20 % composite delivers a record specific capacitance of 202 F g−1 in a three‑electrode test and 78 F g−1 in a symmetric, all‑solid‑state device, yielding an energy density of 6.66 Wh kg−1. The 3D architecture is pivotal in boosting electrochemical performance and maintaining mechanical resilience. Given its cost‑effective synthesis and superior performance, this composite holds promise for next‑generation flexible energy storage solutions and commercial applications.

\n
\n
\n

Abbreviations

\n
\n
BET:
\n

Brunauer-Emmett-Teller

\n
CPs:
\n

Conducting polymers

\n
CV:
\n

Cyclic voltammetry

\n
EDLCs:
\n

Electrochemical double‑layer capacitors

\n
EIS:
\n

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

\n
ESR:
\n

Equivalent series resistance

\n
FESEM:
\n

Field emission scanning electron microscopy

\n
FTIR:
\n

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

\n
g-C3N4:
\n

Graphitic carbon nitride

\n
GCD:
\n

Galvanostatic charge/discharge

\n
GCNW:
\n

g-C3N4 nanowire

\n
MOs:
\n

Transition metal oxides

\n
PEDOT:
\n

PSS: (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly(4-styrenesulfonate)

\n
TEM:
\n

Transmission electron microscopy

\n
XPS:
\n

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

\n
XRD:
\n

X-ray diffraction patterns

\n
\n

Nanomaterials

  1. Carbon Nanotubes Deliver Record Flexibility and Speed in Electronics
  2. Beyond the Factory: 8 Innovative Ways Carbon Fiber Shapes Everyday Life
  3. Graphene‑Polymer Composites for High‑Performance Supercapacitors: A Comprehensive Review
  4. Hierarchical Activated Carbon Fibers from Waste Cotton Gloves: High‑Performance Electrodes for Supercapacitors
  5. Dual-Mode Carbon Nanodot Sensors for Rapid, Selective Hydrogen Peroxide Detection
  6. Enhancing Flexible Transparent Conductors: UV Post‑Treatment of Copper Nanowire Mesh Films
  7. Rapid, One‑Pot Synthesis of Nitrogen‑Doped Microporous Carbon Spheres for Superior Symmetric Supercapacitor Performance
  8. Hierarchical FeOOH‑Decorated Diatomite: A High‑Performance Supercapacitor Electrode
  9. Nitrogen‑Doped Porous Carbon Networks Derived from Graphitic Carbon Nitride for High‑Performance Oxygen Reduction
  10. Advances in Carbon Nanotube Assembly and Integration for Next‑Generation Applications